高考英语作文范文公园应该收门票吗

本篇英语作文《高考英语作文范文公园应该收门票吗》由榜样范文网整理发布，更多小学优秀作文，初中满分作文，高中英语作文，中考高考作文素材发布请关注榜样范文网！

亲爱的编辑，

我想向您介绍我们曾经对是否入会费收费应为公园的讨论你。我们60％的同学认为入场费不符合人民的期望，为一个公园被认为是一个地方，市民可以有一个良好的时候，他们不在家或在工作繁忙。如果入会费必须用于支付公园的游客，有必要建立一个大门和围墙。在最后一个城市将在一个坏的外观。我们40％的同学认为入场费可以接受，但不能过于昂贵。从门票销售的钱可以用来支付在公园的园丁，购买鲜花和树木等种。

至于我自己，我认为入场费是有用的，因为它可以用来保护公园。我们是否有同感，亲爱的编辑器？

此致

李华

 

Dear editor,

　　I’m writing to tell you about the discussion we have had about whether an entrance fee should be charged for parks. Sixty students out of one hundred think that an entrance fee should not be bought before one enters a park, for it is a place for the public to go to when they are free. If a ticket must be bought, a gate and walls have to be built for a park, which will make a city look ugly. Forty students out of one hundred think that an entrance fee should be bought before one enters a park, but that the price of the ticket should be reasonable. Money that is got from ticket selling can be used to pay the gardening workers and buy different kinds of flowers and trees. As for myself, I really think parks are good places to go to at weekends and on holidays. At the same time, we, as visitors, should pay the entrance fee when we enter a park. After all, it takes a lot of money to maintain a park in good working order. Do you aGREe with me, dear editor?

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　Yours truly,

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　Li Hua

亲爱的编辑，

我想向您介绍我们曾经对是否入会费收费应为公园的讨论你。 60出100认为入场费不应购买学生前一进入公园，因为它是一个公共场所去时，他们都是免费的。如果一票，必须买的，一门和墙壁都必须为一个公园，这将使城市建成外观难看。 40出100认为入场费应该买一个学生进入公园前，但该票价格应是合理的。钱是从售票了可用于支付园艺工人和购买各种花卉和树木。至于我自己，我真的觉得公园是好去处于周末和节假日。同时，我们作为游客，应支付入会费，当我们进入一个公园。毕竟，它需要大量的资金，以维持一个良好的工作秩序公园。你是否同意我的，亲爱的编辑器？

此致

李华

 

Dear editor,

　　I’m writing to tell you about the discussion we have had about whether an entrance fee should be charged for parks. Sixty percent of my schoolmates are for the idea that an entrance fee should not be forced on the public. they believe parks are the place where the public enjoy themselves at their leisure. they think that a gate and wails are to be built if an entrance fee is to be charged. the city will not look so beautiful as it should have. Forty percent of my schoolmates are for the idea that an entrance fee is OK, but it shouldn’t be out of control. Entrance fee can be used to pay the gardeners and buy new types of flowers and trees. For myself, I’d like to say that if we all work hard to build our city into a flower garden, who cares about the entrance fee for parks?

　　　　　　　　                                        Yours truly,

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　            Li Hua

亲爱的编辑，

我想向您介绍我们曾经对是否入会费收费应为公园的讨论你。我的同学百分之六十是认为入场费不应强迫市民的想法。他们认为公园是公共的地方享受自己的闲暇。他们认为，一个门和哭声，是一个入口，如果要收取费用建成。这个城市将不再看起来那么美丽，因为它应该有。我的同学百分之40的想法是一个入场费是美好的，但它不应该失去控制。入会费可以用来支付园丁和购买鲜花和树木的新类型。至于我自己，我想说，如果我们都努力建设成为一个花园，谁在乎公园入场费为我们的城市？

此致

李华

Dear editor,

　　I’m writing to tell you about the discussion we have had about whether an entrance fee should be charged for parks. Those against charging entrance fee for parks take up 60%. they are of one mind that parks are a place for the public’s enjoyment. If tickets are demanded on the visitors of a park, a gate has to be set up and so have the walls on the four sides. If so, city will not look as beautiful as it would. Otherwise, those in favour of charging entrance fee for parks take up 40%. they all think that ticket price should be controlled properly, and that entrance fee can be used to pay the gardeners and buy new sorts of flowers and trees. the truth lies in the hands of the majority. Does my argument stand to reason, dear editor?

 

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　             Yours truly,

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　             　Li Hua

亲爱的编辑，

我想向您介绍我们曾经对是否入会费收费应为公园的讨论你。对公园门票收费者占60％。他们是一记，公园是为市民享用。如果门票公园的游客要求，一门要成立，所以对四面墙壁。如果是这样，城市将不再像它看起来会漂亮。否则，在收费停车场占40％，赞成的入场费。他们都认为，门票价格应适当控制，而且门票可以用于支付购买的园丁和新种类花卉和树木。真理掌握在多数人的手中。难道我的论点立场的原因，亲爱的编辑器？

 

Dear editor,

　　I’m writing to tell you about the discussion we have had about whether an entrance fee should be charged for parks. Of all us who have joined in the discussion, 60% share the point of view that an entrance fee should not be charged while 40% share the opposite view. Those who don’t aGREe with the idea think that a park is a place where the public can spend their spare time for pleasure. Those in support of the idea think that entrance fee for parks can’t be beyond control. Those against the idea think that a city’s appearance will be damaged because a gate and wails will be built if an entrance fee is to be collected. Those who aGREe with the idea think entrance fee can be used to pay the gardeners and buy new kinds of flowers and trees. I think it does more good than harm to charge an entrance fee for parks. Am I right, editor?

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　Yours truly,

　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　　Li Hua

 

此致

李华

亲爱的编辑，

我想向您介绍我们曾经对是否入会费收费应为公园的讨论你。在所有我们谁也加入了讨论，60％的份额的角度来看，一个入口不应收取费用，而40％的市场份额则持相反意见。这些谁不同意这一观点认为，公园是一个地方，市民可以用自己的业余时间为乐趣。在支持这种想法的人士则认为对公园门票不能失控。反对的人士则认为，一个城市的面貌将受到损害，因为一门和啼哭声，必定会入场费是要收集兴建。这些谁认同这个认为入场费可用于支付园丁和购买鲜花和树木新种。我觉得它更利远大于弊，为公园收取门票。我说得对，编辑？

此致

李华

关于幸福的真理

我明白了，一个微笑是最廉价的改善自己面孔。很容易选择我们乐观地看到这些世界 evrything 。 当我年轻时，我不是一个特别快乐的孩子，像大多数青少年，我总是形象 evrything 应该是完美的。问题当然是， evrything 去不好，我只是觉得失望，深深失望。 幸福